Recent developments in Iran have captured attention, as the killings of two infamous judiciary figures—Ali Razini and Mohammad Moghiseh—are being widely discussed by regime officials and critics alike. These events, described as acts of terror by the regime’s officials, have raised questions about their implications for the regime’s stability and the deep-seated grievances within Iranian society.
Official Responses: Acknowledging Vulnerability

Mohsen Mahdian, the manager of Hamshahri newspaper, described the assassinations as a sign of “terror in Iran reaching maturity,” targeting what he called “the hard core of the system.” According to Mahdian, the removal of influential figures like Razini and Moghiseh sends “a clear message” to those aligned with the regime, particularly those living under “passive fear.” He attributed the killings to foreign enemies aiming to instill a sense of powerlessness among the populace and to “socialize terror.”

Similarly, Hassan Nowrozi, a former parliamentary representative and judiciary judge, expressed concerns that these targeted killings could lead to disillusionment among the regime’s loyalists. He stated:

“Our enemies from outside the borders… are trying to take those who serve the system from the heart of the revolution.”

Nowrozi acknowledged the role of “negative human rights propaganda” by opponents of the regime, suggesting that the assassinations might be linked to decades of international criticism over Razini’s and Moghiseh’s actions.
Historical Context and Broader Implications

Both Razini and Moghiseh were notorious figures in Iran’s judiciary, remembered for their harsh rulings against dissidents over decades. Their deaths have drawn reactions not just from officials, but also from Iranian citizens. Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi, a former intelligence minister and key figure in the 1988 mass executions of political prisoners, attributed the assassinations to the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). He described the incidents as a “warning bell for the intelligence and security institutions” and emphasized that these were targeted acts likely motivated by longstanding grievances against the regime.

The announcement of their deaths sparked widespread joy among many Iranians, particularly among the families of those executed under their rulings. These judges symbolized a judiciary that has long been a tool of repression, delivering thousands of death sentences during the Islamic Republic’s rule.
Public Grievances and Growing Resentment

The reaction from ordinary Iranians reflects a deeper societal sentiment. Many see the deaths of Razini and Moghiseh as retribution for the suffering inflicted upon the nation over the past four decades. The public anger and collective memory of the regime’s crimes have built up into what some describe as an “ocean of suffering and hatred,” waiting to erupt.

This deep-seated resentment, compounded by years of exploitation, corruption, and religious hypocrisy, has created an atmosphere of unbridled anger. As one observer noted:

“When the quantity of suffering and hatred overshadows the soul of the people, it will undoubtedly convert into an unbridled force for change.”
A Regime on Edge

The Iranian regime is acutely aware of this growing resentment. Officials have repeatedly warned of infiltrators and foreign influence, but the reality is that these assassinations may be symptoms of a much larger crisis. The regime’s efforts to suppress dissent have only deepened public anger, and each wave of protests has brought the country closer to a breaking point.

The assassinations of Razini and Moghiseh, while celebrated by many, also signal the fragility of a regime under siege. The question now is not whether these isolated incidents will spark change but whether they are a prelude to a larger reckoning. As the cracks in the regime’s foundation grow more visible, the specter of a societal tsunami looms, threatening to engulf the very system that has ruled through fear and repression.

Source » irannewsupdate