OUTLAW REGIME: A CHRONICLE OF IRAN’S DESTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES – U.S. Department of State – State.gov – This report was produced by the Iran Action Group.
This report documents the magnitude of the Islamic Republic’s destructive activities at home and abroad. Many of the activities highlighted have occurred recently, while others date back to the early days of the revolution. As this report makes clear, the one constant is that the Iranian regime will do whatever it takes to maintain its grip on power and spread its revolutionary ideology.
The regime’s primary tool to execute this mission since 1979 has been the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The IRGC is the most powerful conglomerat in Iran, spreading and consolidating its control over much of Iranian life. Its navy regularly threatens freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf while its Aerospace Force directs the country’s ballistic missile program in defiance of Security Council esolutions. Its Ground Forces are deployed abroad to bolster the Assad regime and its Basij paramilitary force is mobilized at home to surveil and harass ordinary Iranians. Finally,its extra-territorial IRGC Qods Force (IRGC-QF) leads the Islamic Republic’s destabilizing support for proxies and terrorist groups.
PART 6 – Iran’s Missile Programs
“Iran’s pace of missile launches did not diminish after JCPOA Implementation Day in January 2016, and Iran continues to prioritize its missile force development. Iran has conducted multiple ballistic missile launches since that time.”SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR IRAN BRIAN H. HOOK, SEPTEMBER 2018″
INTRODUCTION
Iran’s development and proliferation of ballistic missiles poses a critical threat to regional security and remains a significant challenge to global nonproliferation efforts. Iran’s proliferation activities have been a concern of the UN Security Council for more than a decade. UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1929, adopted in 2010, placed tough limitations on Iran’s ballistic missile program. The resolution prohibited Iran from undertaking any activity related to ballistic missiles that had the capacity to carry nuclear weapons, recognizing that such missiles would likely be Iran’s preferred method of delivering a warhead in the future. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was finalized in 2015 to curtail Iran’s nuclear program, did not include any meaningful constraints on the regime’s ballistic missile program. Worse yet, as the JCPOA was implemented, UNSCR 1929’s strong language constraining aspects of Iran’s ballistic missile program was weakened. The JCPOA’s failure to address Iran’s ballistic missile proliferation remains one of its enduring shortcomings. With a weaker nonproliferation regime to constrain its activity, Iran has continued to defy international scrutiny as it pushes ahead with its ballistic missile program, conducting tests as well as ongoing research and development, and providing missile capabilities to its proxies in the region.
MISSILE PROLIFERATION
Iran has the largest ballistic missile force in the Middle East, with more than 10 ballistic missile systems either in its inventory or in development, and a stockpile of hundreds of missiles that threaten its neighbors in the region. Iran is continuing to develop a range of solid and liquid propellant short-range and medium-range systems, and is exploring multiple pathways to expand its longer-range missile capabilities. Iran’s pace of missile launches and tests has not diminished following the implementation of the JCPOA and Iran continues to prioritize its missile force development. Iran has conducted numerous ballistic missile launches since the JCPOA has been in effect.
The Iranian regime has failed for years to adhere to restrictions placed on its missile program by the international community. Iran has engaged in numerous missile launches since 2010 that were in violation of UNSCR 1929 and it continues to conduct launches that defy language in UNSCR 2231, which was adopted as part of the JCPOA. The Security Council has catalogued Iranian violations of UNSCR 2231 in its biannual reports since 2016. Prior to the adoption of 2231, Iranian violations of previous UNSCRs related to missile, nuclear, and conventional proliferation were well documented by various UN Panels of Experts. Iran’s ongoing missile tests demonstrate its desire to increase the accuracy and effectiveness of its capabilities. Continued investments in its space launch vehicle program have also been notable. In an August 2017 letter to the UN Secretary-General, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the U.S. condemned Iran’s July 2017 launch of a Simorgh space launch vehicle as inconsistent with UNSCR 2231. Space launch vehicles use technologies that are virtually identical and interchangable with those used in ballistic missiles, in particular Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Separately, the U.S. assesses that in January 2017, Iran conducted a launch of a medium-range missile believed to be the Khorramshahr. The Khorramshahr is designed to carry a payload of at least 1,500 kilograms and could be used to carry nuclear warheads. Its suspected range is at least 2,000 kilometers, which is far enough to reach some European countries.
Iran is increasingly supplying missile technology to its regional proxies. Recent media reporting suggests that Iran is transferring ballistic missiles to Shia militias in Iraq, which targeted U.S. diplomatic facilities in Baghdad and Basra as recently as September 2018. In Lebanon, Iran is supporting Hizballah’s development of missile production facilities as well as advanced precision guidance systems for the group’s large missile stockpile.There is also mounting evidence of Iran’s provision of ballistic missile technology to the Houthis in Yemen. Debris recovered from recent strikes from Yemen into Saudi Arabia indicate that Iran is providing missile support to the Houthis, which can only escalate the conflict further. It also poses an even greater threat to regional security. In one instance, assessments indicate that a missile launched in July 2018 from Yemen into Yanbu, Saudi Arabia was an Iranian Qiam short-range ballistic missile based on unique features identified in the debris. Analysis of the debris, for example, revealed three valves located on the fuel tank, which is a feature uniquely observed on the Qiam. Further investigations have also indicated that a missile launched in November 2017 was also an Iranian Qiam. Recovered debris contained a company logo with the letters SBI, which is used by the Iranian company Shahid Bagheri Industries. A United Nations Panel of Experts’ affirmed in January 2018 that missiles and other military equipment used by the Houthis against Saudi Arabia were in fact Iranian in origin. In response to this attack, U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said, “just imagine if this missile had been launched at Dulles Airport or JFK, or the airports in Paris, London, or Berlin. That’s what we’re talking about here. That’s what Iran is actively supporting.”
ADDRESSING THE THREAT
The international community increasingly recognizes we must take action to counter the further development and proliferation of Iran’s missile program. The U.S. relies on a wide range of tools to address this problem. On the multilateral front, the U.S. works with its partners to interdict missile-related transfers to Iran and to target Iranian missile proliferation activities in third countries. The U.S. and many of its closest partners also participate in the Missile Technology Control Regime and the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation, two multilateral venues to help raise awareness of Iran’s missile development program, choke point technologies, and procurement strategies, and to press countries to take steps to impede Iran’s acquisition of missile technology. The U.S. also reviews thousands of visas annually to ensure that students, researchers, and other foreign visitors are not evading export controls and acquiring technological know-how that could benefit Iran’s missile programs. The U.S. and its partners also use sanctions authorities to penalize entities involved in or supplying technology to Iran’s missile program. In March 2017 and April 2018, the United States imposed sanctions against a total of 19 foreign entities for transferring equipment to Iran’s missile program under authorities provided by the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act. In July 2017, the United States designated 18 entities and individuals under Executive Order (E.O.) 13382 for supporting Iran’s ballistic missile program or otherwise facilitating the regime’s military procurement. E.O. 13382 provides authorities to target proliferators of weapons of mass destruction. In January 2018, the United States designated four additional entities in connection with Iran’s ballistic missile program under E.O. 13382. In May 2018, the U.S. Department of Treasury designated five Iranian individuals for providing ballistic missile-related technical expertise to the Houthis. The individuals were also responsible for transferring weapons to Yemen on behalf of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF). The U.S. will continue to aggressively employ sanctions against Iran’s missile program as we implement the President’s new strategy.
Source » state.gov